Risk Levels
In the MARAM Framework, we determine the level of risk, by the answers provided by the questions on the risk assessments. But it is important to use the risk assessments for ALL parties in the home to determine this level of risk, as they may have different information which will impact on the seriousness of the outcome. It is also important to note that regardless of risk level everyone should receive a service, but the risk level and the existing protective factors should help us determine which supports we prioritise and how services manage the response.
These risk factors are based on the behaviour of the Adult Using Violence and are defined in the Foundational Knowledge Guide as:
- Financial difficulties
- Has ever threatened to harm the victim or family members
- Previous or current breach of court orders/intervention orders
- History of family violence
- Previous or current breach of court orders/intervention orders
- Mental illness / Depression
- Isolation
- Physical Harm
- Emotional Abuse
- Property Damage
- Children’s exposure to family violence
- Sexualised behaviours towards a child by the AUV
- Child intervention in violence
- Behaviour indicating non return of child
- Undermining the child–parent relationship
For a client to be categorised as at-risk there can be NO: escalation, imminence, or the V/S cannot experience a serious level of self assessed fear.
An example of a Risk assessment and rationale, that would be at-risk:
The Adult Experiencing Violence reported the Adult Using Violence has used financial control, to limit access to joint savings accounts, mortgage, and everyday finances. The Adult Experiencing Violence reported that Adult Using Violence has had bouts of depression, but has been well managed with support, for past 5 years.
The Adult Experiencing Violence separated from the other party 6 months ago and there has been no contact, except through legal representatives. The Adult Experiencing Violence holds no fear of the other party. .
This example shows risk factors, but there is no escalation, imminence or fear.
Serious Risk factors are present. These risk factors are based on the behaviour of the Adult Using Violence and are defined in the foundational knowledge guide as:
- Physical assault while pregnant/following new birth
- Planning to leave or recent separation
- Controlling behaviours
- Access to weapons
- Use of weapon in most recent event
- Has ever tried to strangle or choke the V/S
- Has ever threatened to kill victim
- Has ever harmed or threatened to harm or kill pets or other animals
- Has ever threatened or tried to self-harm or commit suicide
- Stalking of victim
- Sexual assault of victim
- Obsession/jealous behaviour toward victim
- Unemployed / Disengaged from education
- Drug and/or alcohol misuse/abuse
- (Children only) History of professional involvement and/ or statutory intervention
- (Children only) Change in behaviour not explained by other causes
- (Children only)Child is a victim of other forms of harm
For a client to be categorised as Serious Risk there can be NO: escalation, imminence, or the person experiencing violence cannot experience a serious level of self assessed fear.
An example of a Risk assessment and rationale, that would be at elevated risk:
Adult Experiencing Violence reported that there was a physical assault, while they were pregnant in 2008. In the incident, the Adult Using Violence pushed the Adult Experiencing Violence up against a wall during a fight about finances.
The Adult Experiencing Violence reported that the Adult Using Violence threatened self harm, three years ago during an episode of depression, and has been under the care of a mental health service since then and has not reported suicide ideation since 2023.
The Adult Experiencing Violence and Adult Using Violence separated 8 months ago, while they are still in the process of separating assets, they are communicating amicably. The Adult Experiencing Violence has no fear of the Adult Using Violence.
This example shows serious risk factors, but there is no escalation, imminence or fear.
Once someone has been at Elevated Risk- They will ALWAYS be at Elevated Risk, because you cannot remove the history of the elevated risk factors.
Serious Risk
For serious risk to be present, you need any of the risk factors listed in the Elevated Risk Section (minimum of one) AND any combination of:
- Imminence
- Escalation
- Self assessed level of fear by the V/S
An example of a Risk assessment and rationale, that would be at serious risk:
The Adult Experiencing Violence stated to children’s teacher:
“I need to go, my partner is monitoring where I am, he doesn’t want me out of the house for long, he’s been getting worse lately, I am really scared of what he will do if I stay any longer”
In this instance a full risk assessment has not been undertaken but because the limited information we have shows:
- Controlling behaviours/possible stalking
- Escalation
- Self assessed level of fear
We categorise this as Serious Risk and work with relevant agencies to support an environment where a full risk assessment for all members of the family can be undertaken.
Once someone is categorised as serious risk, the work of comprehensive services (who do not provide therapeutic supports) is to support establishing protective factors around the family to reduce or remove the likelihood of family violence reoccurring or continuing. The aim is to move the risk from Serious Risk to Elevated (remember, once you have been at elevated risk, you can never be categorised at-risk again).